Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 8-13, February 2012

Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance among Nosocomial Pathogens in South Africa: Systematic Review of Published Literature

  • P. Nyasulu

      Affiliations

    • School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
  • ,
  • J. Murray

      Affiliations

    • School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
    • National Institute of Occupational Health of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • ,
  • O. Perovic

      Affiliations

    • School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
    • National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • ,
  • H. Koornhof

      Affiliations

    • School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
    • National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa

Received 13 August 2011; received in revised form 24 September 2011; accepted 28 September 2011. published online 29 December 2011.

There has been a significant increase in the prevalence of antimicrobial drug resistance in sub-Saharan Africa. This may increase health-care costs due to patients' needs for more diagnostic tests, longer hospitalization, and poor outcome. Therefore, monitoring systems for resistance patterns are needed to effectively minimize poor outcome. A systematic review was conducted to find out the prevalence of antimicrobial drugs' resistance among Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and to understand whether or not such data were part of an ongoing surveillance system for nosocomial infections in South Africa. An online search of main databases, including Cochrane Library, PUBMED, and MEDLINE, was done using the following search terms: “antimicrobial resistance” and “surveillance”; “antimicrobial susceptibility” and “surveillance”; Staphylococcus aureus or Klebsiella pneumoniae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa; “nosocomial” or “hospital acquired”; or South Africa or Africa. We also performed manual search of local conferences, theses, and dissertations to identify relevant articles. In total, 41 manuscripts were identified of which eight were analyzed. There is no evidence of any ongoing antimicrobial resistance surveillance for nosocomial pathogens in South Africa. Data reported in this review seem to have been analyzed on an ad hoc basis and do not show a particular resistance pattern; however, data show evidence of resistance to commonly used antimicrobial drugs in this population: for S aureus, resistance to cloxacillin was 29% and to erythromycin 38%; for K pneumoniae, resistance to ciprofloxacillin was 35% and to ampicillin 99%; and for P aeruginosa, the mean resistance to ciprofloxacillin was 43% and to amikacin 35%. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance is essential to better understand the complexity of antimicrobial resistance development. Such evidence would be used in developing an effective surveillance program to monitor patterns and trends of resistance over time.

Key words: antimicrobial resistance, bacterial pathogens, nosocomial infections, surveillance

 

PII: S1878-3317(11)00156-2

doi:10.1016/j.jecm.2011.11.002

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 8-13, February 2012